Good advice for anyone considering renting a home

Young people don’t expect to own their own home until they’re in their forties, according to a recent survey.* It is no surprise that attitudes are changing, with people happy to rent as they realise they’re priced out of the housing market. When asked about their plans, 38% said that owning a home “wasn’t critical” to them.

If you are one of the millions who aren’t desperate to get on the property ladder, renting can give you great flexibility and the chance to live in an area that you might never be able to afford if you were trying to buy a home. Once you’ve found your dream flat or house to rent, there are a number of things you’ll need to remember before moving in day:

  • Although you won’t need buildings insurance, it’s essential that you have a good contents insurance policy in place. It’s up to the landlord to insure the building, but don’t get caught short when it comes to your own possessions. Some contents insurance policies offer unlimited cover, but others will require you to list the value of your belongings so make sure everything is included.

  • Find out who the gas and electricity supplier is as soon as you move in and give them an up-to-date meter reading on the first day. That way, you won’t end up paying for gas and electricity used by anyone who lived there before you. Ask your supplier for a rough idea of how much the bills will be, and if you’re on a tight budget or don’t fancy any nasty surprises set up a direct debit so that you know exactly how much you’ll be paying each month.

  • Check with your water supplier to find out if you’ll be paying a straightforward bill or whether the property is on a meter.

  • Ask the landlord or agent how recently the locks have been changed. It’s safest if they’re changed when you move in so you know you’re the only one with a key.

  • Rented flats and houses may be unfurnished, furnished or part furnished. Agree to go through an inventory with your landlord or agent so you’re all clear on exactly what’s in the house – from a TV to cutlery. This might sound like a tedious job, but if you have it written down it will save any misunderstandings when you come to move out and get your deposit back. If anything isn’t in pristine condition, note that down too, so you won’t be saddled with a bill for damage at the end of your tenancy.

[*] Source – Findaproperty.com

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Brandon Tool Hire – Why employees should be careful what they sign!

Why employees should be careful what they sign!

A recent case was reported in the Mail on Sunday where an employee of a building company went to Brandon Tool Hire to hire a cement mixer on his employer’s behalf. He even used the company’s credit card for the deposit! However the company he worked for Weald 24 Limited, ceased trading and the cement mixer was never returned. As a result, Brandon Tool Hire is holding the employee responsible and has successfully sued him, winning a judgement for £3,022! 

How can an employee be personally liable for his employer’s debts?

When the employee collected the mixer, he was asked for his driving licence and signed the Brandon dispatch note. The note, whilst not specifically labelled as any contract or agreement, did state that whoever signs it agrees to the terms and conditions small print on the back. 

Brandon’s boss Tim Smith says that an employee would not be responsible “if the customer had a trade account” but how many employees would know whether their employer has a trade account or not. 

In this case Brandon is still pursuing the ex employee for his employer’s liability.

I would suggest that anyone working and signing on behalf of an employer should be cautious and consider using a false name! I suspect that many building sites up and down the country will suddenly find that “John Smith” or “Mike Mouse” is signing for quite a lot of deliveries! 

Anyone using Brandon Tool Hire should sign a false name, or at least sign “signed on behalf of the hirer ?????? Ltd, no contract or liability exists with signatory” to protect themselves if the employer does not pay the bill.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Do not renew your home insurance without getting alternative quotes

You don’t need to be a Meerkat to realise that it is always best the check the market before accepting your existing insurer’s renewal quote. There are many direct online companies now offering discounts.

As the Mail on Sunday recently reported with the case of an 85-year-old gentleman who had renewed his home insurance with Aviva for many years, renewing can leave you seriously out of pocket. For his ordinary three bedroom terraced town house built in 1935 he was paying a massive £912 a year for home and contents insurance.

When he first insured with Aviva in 2001 his premiums were just £220. Aviva acknowledge that across the insurance industry quotes for existing customers are normally higher than those for new customers as they often include offers or large discounts which vary each year.

It is disgraceful that people are still being taken for a ride by large financial institutions. The above insurance would be less than £300 with nearly every insurance provider. Even Aviva quoted £269 quite a big drop when his daughter threatened to cancel the policy and move elsewhere. He also got a cheque for £300 by way of an apology – no doubt after 12 years of over charging Aviva can well afford to do so.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

The total of 115,620 new homes were built in 2012.

New Home Completions and dwelling stock figures for England released

The estimated number of residential homes in England produced by the Department for Communities and Local Government statistics were released on Thursday 25 April 2013. The figures show that the estimated number of dwellings in England increased by 0.59% on the previous year to 23.1 million. This is the lowest annual increase in any of the previous 10 years and demonstrating not enough new homes are being built. 

This is split into 19 million private dwellings (owner-occupied and private rented) and 4 million social rented homes. The Social rented stock rose by 12,000 between March 2011 and March 2012.

Total annual housing completions for 2012 were 115,620, an increase of 1% on the previous year. The current level of completions is still 35% below the December 2007 peak level of 177,000. New Home completions fell through 2008, 2009 and in the year to December 2010 just 107,000 new homes were completed.

In the 12 months to December 2012, the majority of new homes started were in Buckinghamshire, Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, and Northamptonshire, along the M5 corridor from Devon up to Worcestershire and along the A303 route from London through Hampshire into Wiltshire 

Despite falling over recent years the percentage of owner-occupied homes remains at 65%.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Leasehold homes are rapidly losing their value

Many are seeing the value of their new homes fall and this is not as a result of the property market!

Around a tenth of all owner-occupied homes are leasehold. That is 1.43million homes, 817,000 of which are flats. Leasehold is when the land on which the property is built is not sold with the home. All leasehold homes are only owned for the duration of the lease, after which the ownership reverts to the freeholder.

The maximum length for a lease is 999 years. But many new homes have been built with leases that are just 99 years. As owners soon discover, when a lease has less than 80 years left, the value of the home decreases. Properties lose around 5% of the value when a lease reaches the 80-year mark.

When the lease is 60 years or less, homes start to rapidly lose their value and become all but impossible to sell or re mortgage. Most lenders require at least 55 years left on the lease, with around 30 years left at the end of the mortgage term.  Many new homes sold in the 1980’s with 99-year leases may now only have 65 years remaining.

Leaseholders should look at extending their lease when it reaches 85 years. A lease can be extended by 50 years for a house and 90 years for flats. The 1993 Leasehold Reform Act made it possible for all leaseholders to extend their lease by up to 90 years and gives them to legal right to buy the freehold.

Continue reading

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Five reasons why ‘Help-To-Buy’ is a bad idea

Five problems with the Help-To-Buy scheme.

1. It could create a house price bubble

The UK is not building sufficient new homes to meet demand. Instead of focusing policy on the supply side the government has taken steps to increase demand by making it easier for people who couldn’t and perhaps shouldn’t to get on the housing ladder.

It is basic economics that if demand increases without an increasing supply prices will rise as a consequence of the shortage.

Government policy should not be underwriting and subsidising another housing bubble. This policy is not making homes more affordable but will make them easier and more expensive to buy.

2. It could help the well-off buy a second home

The Treasury has published a list of those who would be eligible to benefit from the Mortgage Guarantee element of the Help to Buy scheme, which is available on properties up to £600,000.

This did not rule out people using the scheme to buy a second home- an issue still yet to be clarified by the Government. The scheme may even be used by existing owners to remortgage their property.

As it stands, unless the eligibility criteria is revised to rule out people exploiting the scheme it looks like Osborne is making it easier for the well off to get wealthier.

3. Government policy should focus on social housing

Most experts argue that the State should be focusing policies that increase the provision of social housing to help those most in need in our society, rather than attaching itself to the mortgage market and helping house builders by making it easier to buy a new home.

The government should not be encouraging mortgage providers to lend to borrowers that it would otherwise consider too risky.

We all know what happens next.

The Government funds allocated for social housing are small beer when compared to the scale of Help to Buy, which could potentially underwrite £130bn of home loans.

4. The taxpayer is exposed to huge losses

If Help-To-Buy starts price bubble in the housing market that then bursts, leading to a property price crash many borrowers “helped” to buy could default on their repayments and lenders being forced to repossess and sell.

If house prices fall with resultant losses, it will be the taxpayer picking up most of the liability.

5. It may not lead to cheaper mortgages

At present only the banks partly owned by the taxpayer, Lloyds Banking Group and Royal Bank of Scotland have agreed to use the Help to Buy Mortgage Guarantee Scheme. If the scheme is to be a success it will depend on the uptake by lenders and the extent to which they reduce their rates and fees prices to account for the Government underwriting loan guarantee.

At present current financial regulations force banks to hold over six times more capital against 95% loan as they do for a 60% loan. The regulator may be looking at offering banks some relief from the capital adequacy rules.
 

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Why most UK home buyers would NOT buy a home built after 2003

 

Three-quarters of the British public would never buy a home built in the last 10 years.
That is the finding of a 2010 YouGov poll carried out on behalf of the RIBA as part of their study into the ever decreasing size of UK new homes, now on average 80% smaller than an equivalent European Union new home.
One in four home buyers would avoid any home built in the last 10 years.

There are many reasons given but overwhelmingly the most common is that new homes are just too small and too dark.
There are also many other Disadvantages.

The RIBA Case for Space study found that buyer’s priorities vary with 69% saying that a high level of natural light was important to them.
A further 51% confirmed that room size was the most important factor when looking to buy a home.
Outside space was important to 47%.
Privacy to 49% and the appeal and look of the street or estate being important to 43%

It is therefore no surprise that the following reasons were given why those surveyed in the Future Homes Commission’s Report (September 2011) would choose not to buy a new home:
* Lack of storage space
* Lack of privacy from neighbours
* Poor sound insulation
* Lack of outdoor space
* Not enough space in rooms
* Small windows/not enough natural light
* Inflexibility of spaces for communal and private living or for future changes in the

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter