Why the least expensive solicitor is never the best.

A recent report released by the Legal Ombudsman shows  a high rise in the number of complaints against solicitors – in particular against conveyancers.   One of the most serious issues that has grabbed the headlines were reports of solicitors not paying the stamp duty on behalf of their clients.   Whilst rare, this is  fraudulant.  HMRC, often many years later, are coming after homeowners for payment of the original stamp duty due with interest charges added on top.  

Deeds 2Of the 7,500 complaints received by legal ombudsman in the survey, around 18% were concerned with residential conveyancing.  It is thought that this due to a large extent, by the growth in the number of online conveyancers and so-called “tick-box, bucket shop style, call centre conveyancing services” often offering a conveyancing service for as little as £300.  

Buying a home is almost always likely to be the largest purchase most people will ever make. It is a legal transaction and buyers and sellers need professional and qualified legal representation.  Yet despite this, after looking at the other costs involved in moving home, many choose ‘cheap’ rather than ‘best’ when it comes to appointing a solicitor – a decision as the report highlights, many often deeply regret.   

It is always best to have a solicitor who is local to you so that when there are issues they can be discussed face to face.  They could be complex and if there is a problem you need a professional on your side to solve the problems on your behalf, not just part of a box ticking exercise.  You may find there are issues years later when you come to sell the house that were missed by the conveyancer when you bought.  

The advice is always to get a recommendations from people who have just bought or sold. Speak to them.  Then ask yourself: Does the solicitor sound competent? How well do they communicate?  Will they protect your interests? Feel free to negotiate on their fees but don’t skimp.   

Finally, if you are buying a newly built home, never, repeat never use the solicitor “recommended” or “suggested” by the house builder. They may claim it will be “quicker” and “easier” but you can be sure there will be a conflict of interest. In addition, under the Consumer Code for Home Builders, Requirement 2.5 states that house builders cannot restrict your choice of legal representation.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Estate Agents start charging house buyers fees as well as sellers

Talk about having your cake and eating it, greedy estate agents have started to charge desperate buyers a “finders fee” according to The Mail Online, It says those “desperate” to move to a larger home are being asked to pay fees up to £4,000. “..at the same time, the seller must also pay out the usual fee to an estate agent for selling their old home.” 

For sale board 2These new fees are yet another cost for cash-strapped buyers who are already paying ever increasing costs to move home, including 3%  Stamp Duty as well as their own estate agent’s fee to sell their property – at least 1% of the sale price. 

It is questionable if there are any advantages for buyers and estate agents are getting a great deal of bad publicity and negative attention about this practice, termed a “sales technique” in Estate Agent Today.

Buyers are being forced to pay these fees due to a shortage of properties that come onto the market. Such is the stampede for the best homes; you have to question why sellers even need an agent in the current bubble market. 

An NAEA spokesman defended the increasing use of finders’ fees, claiming it a symptom of the pressures on supply in the current market:                        “Common practice for estate agency fees is for the fee to fall to the seller in return for the agent’s role in marketing the property, securing the sale and negotiating the transition with the buyer and others who may be part of the chain. However, given the current pressures on supply in the market, some agents may well consider changing their fee structures to encourage more sellers to the market by reducing fees for those selling a property and instead introducing a finder’s fee to help buyers find the right property. In whatever instance a fee is levied, however, our code of conduct is clear that all agents must be upfront and transparent about the fee being charged” 

A probe has been launched into the borderline legality of the increasingly widespread practice of charging both sellers and buyers fees. It started as a charge to buyers when they succeeded in a “sealed bid” tender process, levying a typical fee of 2.5% of the successful bid price. However now finders’ fees to buyers are also becoming commonplace. 

Property Ombudsman Christopher Hamer said:     “the agents’ clear legal obligations are to the seller and entering into a contract with prospective buyers may well compromise that and be seen as a conflict of interest.” 

The only people this will help will be the estate agents, who will end up getting double their usual fees. It would appear they are trying to get back their crown from bankers, as the most greedy and despised profession.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Is the Consumer Code for Home Builders fit for purpose?

After close examination of the recent Adjudication Scheme case histories, we ask……..Is the Consumer Code for Home Builders worth the paper it is written on?    The clue is in the name “For Home Builders” not for homebuyers.  At best, house builders tend to view the Code as voluntary or optional despite many of the Code requirements actually being required by consumer legislation.   At worst, as is shown by the published case summaries, house builders knowingly continue to disregard the Code requirements in the full and certain knowledge that the worst that could happen would be slap on the wrists and a small award against them.  Now in it’s fifth year, the Code is frequently referred to by the industry being used as an opportunity to promote new homes.

Consumer Code coverThe Consumer Code for Home Builders was launched in April 2010 apparently as a response to the Barker Review in 2004 and Office of Fair Trading – Market Study of Home Building in the UK published in October 2008. The Consumer Code is allegedly the house building industry’s response to the issues raised in those reports relating to customer service and satisfaction. It was created by a “group of stakeholders within the industry” who “joined forces to consider the issues raised” to “produce a Code of Conduct for home builders.” It was first launched in April 2010 – over FIVE YEARS after the deadline in Barker’s report!

CodeThe Code claims to:  “provide protection and rights to purchasers of new homes, ensuring that all new home buyers are treated fairly and are fully informed.”  But the protection already exists with The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, making it a legal requirement to treat consumers fairly and The Business Protection from Misleading Marketing Regulations 2008 reinforces the legal requirement not to make misleading or false statements. The Consumer Code for Home Builders if strictly followed, should result in compliance with the legislation, probably the main reason it was created by the house building industry.

The Code applies to all house builders registered with the new home warranty providers such as the NHBC, LABC Warranty and Premier Guarantee.  It consists of 19 requirements and principles that house builders must adhere to in marketing, selling homes and their after-sales customer service.  Failure by a house builder to adhere to the code requirements can result in exclusion from all registers run by the warranty bodies that participate in the scheme. Has this ever happened?  Very unlikely!

But is the Consumer Code effective?  –  Do house builders strictly follow it?  –  Are punitive penalties being imposed on builders who are found to have deliberately breached the Code?   Going by the latest published Adjudication Case Summaries for 2013 it would appear not.

Continue reading

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

New mortgage strict affordability stress tests for borrowers

As we pointed out on 21 January, those wanting a mortgage will be subjected additional financial scrutiny under the new “affordability tests” imposed by the Financial Conduct Authority which come into force at the end of this week called the Mortgage Market Review. Many lenders have already been slowly introducing the procedure since our first article

Under the new regime, lenders will carry out a thorough “forensic” investigation of a borrower’s finances. An initial mortgage assessment at a branch could last as long as two hours according to Halifax and Santander. Lenders will want to know more details about borrower’s day to day finances, including, how much they earn, spending on food and utility bills every month, gym membership, mobile phone contracts and the size of any existing debts. 

Continue reading

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Pay row at Persimmon over Director’s share incentive plan

Jeff Fairburn 2sThe Daily Mail reported this week that three Persimmon directors are in line to receive a staggering £100 million pay windfall. This is part of a £400 million bonus pot linked to a long-term incentive plan equating to around 10% of Persimmon’s market value.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERATo qualify for the huge payout, Persimmon must give shareholders 620p in dividends between now and 2021. The rewards plan 2012 – around 30million shares in Persimmon, will pay out to several directors. Chief executive Jeff Fairburn, finance director Mike Killoran and southern regional director Nigel Greenaway all stand to share around £100 million. To qualify for the payment, Persimmon must pay certain dividend amounts by the end of 2015, 2017, 2019 and 2021. For 2015, the required amount is 170p. The firm has already declared dividends of 145p and has announced an intention to pay 95p in 2015. So job done for the first tranch of shares! If any biennial target is missed the scheme folds, although they will be able to keep any shares already secured from achieving earlier targets, but they will have to pay to get their shares. If all the targets are met by 2021, they get the shares for free.

Persimmon say the scheme was drawn up when the share price was 620p and that the directors would have to double the size of the company in ten years to benefit. A spokesman for Persimmon told the Daily Mail:

The analysis simply assumes that the share price in 2021 will be the same as it is today and ignores the challenge of returning £1.9billion to shareholders, while simultaneously growing the business to deliver an increase in the ex-dividend share price performance period of almost ten years……..This is a long term plan which is designed to drive outperformance through the housing cycle and there remains a very long way to go”

Continue reading

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Taylor Wimpey threaten to take buyer to court over Help To Buy non-payment

After a a few problems and issues with his new home, despite the completion date being postponed by a month (6th December 2013), one unlucky buyer recently told us that Taylor Wimpey had constantly threatened him with legal proceedings on a daily basis. Amazingly Taylor Wimpey and both the respective solicitors allowed legal completion on his new home without the Help to Buy funding in place and later transferred to Taylor Wimpey – an underpayment shortfall of £44,000. 

Mr K told us:       “In the first week of January, we learned that our solicitor had not sent us the Help to Buy equity release form to sign. He played this down claiming it was a simple paperwork mix-up or oversight. Two days later, we received a call from Taylor Wimpey informing us that they are going to take us to court because for breach of contract as we have not provided the full funds on completion.”

Help To Buy jpg“It transpired that the Help to Buy money had not been released to Taylor Wimpey and they cannot take our solicitor to court, they can only take us to court. The lady from Taylor Wimpey said that even if they did get the balance of the money, we had still breached the terms of our mortgage and they were going to report this to our lender and the mortgage would be revoked.”

“Next we then get a call from the lady who deals with Help to Buy (Radian homes) who inform us that the mortgage offer is incorrectly worded and needs to be changed, otherwise they cannot release the money to Taylor Wimpey. Our solicitor insists the mortgage offer doesn’t need to be changed, Help to Buy insist it does and in the meantime, Taylor Wimpey continue to call us on a daily basis threatening to take us to court.”

“Both Taylor Wimpey and Help to Buy say that our solicitor is incompetent. Our solicitor then suggests that they are both partly to blame as well. We are considering appointing a professional negligence solicitor to take over the file with Taylor Wimpey saying that if we did, that they would take us to court straight away.” 

Continue reading

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Ultra low interest rates a stealth tax on savers creating a house price bubble

The country is £1.2trillion in debt. The national debt has tripled in the last 10 years and the cost of interest to service this debt is the fourth largest cost to the country, behind education, welfare and health. The interest payments on the national debt cost each of the 30 million UK taxpayers more than £1,650 a year. Yet this Chancellor appears to have “spare money” to give to house builders? In a little under a year, according to figures from the Home Builders Federation (HBF), 55,000 reservations have been made using Help to Buy. Now the scheme has been extended to 2020, at the current rate around 385,000 new homes could be sold using the Help to Buy state-subsidy. 

MoneyThe Bank of England interest rate has been stuck at 0.5% for five years now – the lowest rate for 300 years. Who has this benefited? The winners are – anyone with a mortgage they shouldn’t really be able to afford, companies looking for cheap debt and the government, which has been able to add to the national debt aided by the very low rates. Oh and those that own shares, especially house builders shares. 

Continue reading

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

HBF 2014 Customer Satisfaction survey results published.

The Home Builders Federation has recently released the results of the National New Home Customer Satisfaction Survey 2014. The first page of the “results” has been used by the HBF as an opportunity for a public relations promotion of new homes.   Crikey, they must be good!   Who would have known?

“High level of Homeowner satisfaction”   “Customer satisfaction levels for new homes have consistently been extremely high”

Barratt NHBF Star ratingQuite a claim considering that the results are from just 32,137 new home owners out of a total of the 109,370 new homes completed during 2013 – that’s just 29.4%!  Only 55% of the surveys sent out were returned – or used to compile the results!

We have the old chestnuts that new homes are “fresh, bright and clean” – another surprise given that new homes are normally dark due to fewer and smaller windows and small cramped rooms.  As for clean, many new homes are handed over in a terrible state after an ineffective builder’s clean.       “Blank canvas”  “better for the environment” – it’s all there,   it’s all good,  what’s not to like?

Continue reading

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

The Help to Buy madness is being extended by four years to 2020.

George Osborne has announced that the lunacy of his Help to Buy scheme for new-build homes is to be extended for a further FOUR YEARS to 2020,  less than a year after it was first made available. 

Help To Buy jpgThose keen on the stock market can watch today as builders share prices soar still further on this latest announcement. Already share prices of Bovis, Crest and Persimmon are up around 4.5%.  Remember this is taxpayer’s that are funding the five-year interest free loans, after we at least receive 1.75% on our money! This extension t0 the scheme will cost taxpayers a further £6billion! Also let us not forget that, at the same time, George Osborne is steadfastly refusing to raise the 40% income tax thresholds, despite calls from many in his own party as well as two ex-chancellors Nigel Lawson and Norman Lamont. Just over 1.7million paid the top rate threshold twenty years ago. Today that figure is 4.4million and is predicted to rise to 5million before the next election in 2015. 

Continue reading

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Despite builder’s profits, not enough new homes are being built.

Despite housebuilder’s results  last week reporting an average  16% increase in the number of homes they had built during 2013, house building output is actually 11.3% below pre financial crisis levels. The number of new homes started in 2013 was 122,590, the highest since 2007. But this is still HALF the number experts say are needed each year to meet housing demand, let alone addressing the shortages from previous years. 

P1000442However, the number of new homes completed last year actually fell by 5% to 109,370. The Government’s schemes have not helped either, creating easier access to borrowed money  resulting in boosted demand rather than increased supply,  sending house prices soaring,  especially in the south. 

Home ownership has now fallen to its lowest level in 25 years. The number of people sleeping rough in England has increased by over 30% since 2010. The proportion of working households claiming housing benefit is now higher than 2010.  Hardly a success story Mr Cameron!  At the same time, the large plc housebuilder’s are returning cash piles generated from the record profit increases, to their shareholders.

Continue reading

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter